Hi, On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 17:24 -0500, Carsten Neumann wrote: > Hi again, > > Carsten Neumann wrote: > > is this a todo item or is it meant to be this way ? If the latter, what > > is the rationale for it ? > > on a somewhat related note, the attached unit test passes, except for > the very last CHECK_EQUAL. Apparently nrp0->getMFChildren()->at(0) is > still there although the child has been moved to a different parent. > Does that sound like something that should work or should I just start a > debugging session ? ;) >
I'll have a look. kind regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
