Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Neumann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working on the tutorial (on the wiki) and adding/revising >> the parts about pointer types. To keep things simple I recommend there >> that beginners just use RefPtr for all pointers, but also explain the >> other types available for more advanced users. >> However, should the tutorial recommend RefPtr or better RecPtr (the >> latter makes clearer what it does, although beginners might not >> care/understand the relevance) ? >> If we go for RecPtr I'd volunteer to also fix the examples in the >> Tutorials dir of the code :) >> >> Comments/Preferences ? >> > I vote RecPtr. I'd mention that it's a synonym for RefPtr, but I don't > see a reason to teach them 'wrong' stuff.
Can't we just settle for _one_ name per type, please? (And I vote for RefPtr, which is consistent with earlier OpenSGs and other APIs as well) Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
