Hi All,
Marcus Lindblom wrote:
> Thiago Bastos wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm having a bit of a hard time trying to follow the
>> nomenclature/installation standards in effect on OpenSG 2.0 (revision
>> 1684).
>>
>> First, the install directory for libs differ on Windows and Linux. On
>> Linux the Release libs go to "lib", the Debug libs go to "lib/debug"
>> and the DebugRT libs go to "lib/debugrt". On Windows the libs go to
>> "lib/opt", "lib/dbg" and "lib/debugrt", respectively.
>>
>> Second, I think it's a bit problematic to have both the Release and
>> Debug libs with the same name. It would be preferable to have the libs
>> in the same dir with different suffixes, so we wouldn't need to update
>> any environment variable (PATH/LD_LIBRARY_PATH) to switch between the
>> Debug and Release version of our applications.
>>
> I just want to chip in that I second this. Every setting should have a
> different suffix, so it's easy to select between them.
>
> And another wish is to have _all_ builds generate pdb files, regardless
> of their optimizations status.
>
I guess this is a bit of a Linux/Windows fight. Personally I like the
ability to just change the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to switch from release to
debug if I have to, without having to recompile my app. But to do that
the .sos need to have the same name. Am I the only one who cares about that?
I understand the Windows convention is different, which is where the
problem with a single build system comes in.
Yours
Dirk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
