Hi Gerrit,
Gerrit Voss wrote:
>
>> At least now we know of the potential problems of combining
>> statically-linked support libs with the standard CMake linker flags :-)
>> No idea if this is something easy to improve on your side...
>
> the only 'real' solution I see is to go the VTK way and provide the
> support libs in a way that you can build them together with OpenSG using
> the same settings. Windows seems to fragile to test for all possible
> combinations ;-(. So at least providing on option where we can have
> reasonable good control over the environment is the best solution I
> can see right now.
I don't know, that sounds painful. :(
Can we make it work for the support libs that provide a Windows
installer/download and only provide our own versions for the ones that
don't?
Maybe we can make our lives easier by switching the image loader to
something like DevIL, which avoids a lot of the external libs that we use?
Yours
Dirk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
