Hi, On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:25 -0500, Carsten Neumann wrote: > Hello Gerrit, > > Gerrit Voß wrote: > > I'm cleaning a little bit and stumbled across the fact that a > > lot of the image fields are signed (e.g. width, height, bpp). > > As far as I can tell unsigned should be ok too, as none of > > them uses for example -1 to signal something. > > > > So the question, does anybody see a problem to switch them to > > UInt32 ? > > what about 1.x OSB files? I guess they may just continue working since > Int32 and UInt32 are similar enough? >
they should, both read the same amount of bytes so the stream should stay in sync and I don't expect negative values for any of the parameters. At least I haven't seen anything in the code that would expect them. The only occurrence of negative values is for some function parameters where -1 just means work on the whole image as stored. But never for anything that is stored inside the image. kind regards gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
