Hello all,
Carsten Neumann wrote:
> creating a matrix from 3 or 4 Vec3 leaves the element [3][3] as 0. I can
> see an argument for this when using the 4 Vec3 version [1], but when
> using just 3 Vec3 this seems to be a bug.
> For many uses it would probably also be convenient to change the 4
> argument c'tor, but I'm less certain about that.
I just committed what I consider the non-controversial part, i.e. set
[3][3] = 1 for the 3 Vec3 c'tor and I added a 4 Vec4 c'tor.
Another alternative is to just get rid of the 4 Vec3 c'tor, I don't
think it is all that useful in its current form...
Cheers,
Carsten
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
