Hello Gerrit,
On 18.08.2010 19:07, Gerrit Voß wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:07 -0500, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> short question, so I have the full picture, what was the reason behind
> r2472 because that one changed what was recorded and what was not ?
on the cave side in our app attachments were dying when
RemoteAspect::receiveSync() cleared the newContainers vector at the end.
The change in r2472 helped for that case and seemed to simply correct a
mixup (it does not seem to make sense to use recorded ref count changes
on the attachments if the AttachmentContainer itself is MTLocal).
Having thought a bit more about this now I believe
AttachmentContainer::_sfAttachments should behave like any other field,
i.e. only make unrecorded changes - if that is not the correct behavior
all other containers would have the same issue.
Cheers,
Carsten
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
