Hi,

On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 03:49, Dirk Reiners wrote:
>       Hi folks,
> 
> I'm back! Tadaa! ;)
> 
> On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 21:12, Gerrit Voss wrote:
> > 
> > > The next thing on my plate is making OpenSG not produce so many warnings 
> > > with warning level 3.  It's extremely annoying to work with libraries 
> > > that generate hundreds upon hundreds of warnings.  -_-
> > 
> > I know I know but before you put in to much works be aware that there
> > are quite some changes coming up which currently are build in a
> > different tree. So it would be probably a good idea to coordinate
> > this a little bit ;-)
> 
> A lot of those come from the Geometry, which is a candiate for rewrite,
> so don't worry too much about those.

IIRC there are (were) more regular ones, e.g Functors which are included
a lot more than geometry so I count these a little bit worse as they
might be only a few but they show up in so many different places. Having
one file that spits 50 warnings is not nice but having a file with 4
warning that spits them for nearly 200 files you compile  is no fun at
all ;-))

gerrit




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users

Reply via email to