Hi On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 00:57, Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi Chad, > > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 03:16, Chad Austin wrote: > > Dirk Reiners wrote: > > > they only have different names on Windows, on the Unices they are the > > > same. This allows you to switch from dbg to opt by just setting > > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which I think is extremely useful. > > > > Okay, I see. I agree that's useful. However, 'make install' makes a > > lib/opt and lib/dbg, while the dailybuild icl60 dist release (the > > Windows installer) has all of the libraries -- both debug and release -- > > under lib. Shouldn't the installer be consistent with 'make install'? > > well, the dists are really meant for end-users, i.e. the people who > don't want to or don't know how to compile the source, so their > structure is totally different anyway, both under Unix and under > Windows. > > But you're right, it would be nicer to have all libs in one dir on > Windows, we just haven't taken the time to do that. It didn't seem to be > that pressing yet. > > If you want to take a shot, take a look at the install-libs target in > Common/commonTopLevel.mk, as far as I can see that's the only place you > would have to change. Gerrit, is that right? I attached a quick version > of that target which might work, but I haven't tested it on cygwin. If > it works please tell me and I'll commit it.
looks ok to me (without trying) ;-) gerrit ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
