Hi Bjoern,
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 00:25, Björn Harmen Gerth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I said "too spezialized", not "too interesting" :-)
;)
> Say, I have a kind of geometry drawn with multiple
> faces which are partitioned into several materials. I
> made an FC, say MyGeo, directly derived from NodeCore,
> which has a field with that geometry.
> In addition, there is an FC, say MyFacesAndMat, not
> derived from NodeCore, which holds a MaterialPtr, a
> list of faces and a MyGeoPtr. It has a method
> drawPrimitives which knows which faces of MyGeo to
> draw.
> MyGeo in turn holds an MField of MyFacesAndMatPtr.
Ok, I think I understand. What was the motivation for writing this
special core instead of just using multiple simple Geometries?
> I thought this idea is too specialized because two
> FieldContainers are involved.
It's a stretch for generality, but I'm always interested in what people
are doing, so I had to ask. ;)
Thanks
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op�ick
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
