Hi Marcus,
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Marcus Lindblom wrote:
>
> Neat! That means that I have to be careful whether I use a const pointer
> or not. Couldn't that be tricky given that I sometimes read and
> sometimes write using a non-const pointer? Or maybe this isn't a
> problem? (I'm mostly curious as how this is resolved.)
It isn't. If you get a non-const iterator, we will have to assume that
you actually use it for writing. That's why it's important to use const
iterators for reading. ;)
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to collaborate
online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of travel and
communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as often as
you want. Try it free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7402&alloc_id=16135&op=click
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
