Hi, > > To that end, I am wondering why OSG::SharedObjectHandler::terminate() is > not > called in OSG::osgExit(). Is this an oversight, or is there a non-trivial > problem that arises from doing so?
In the first place it is an oversight, but on a second thought there might be some interesting issues regarding the type objects in the current version as they don't deregister and terminate on destruction right now. Let me thing about it a little bit. regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
