Hi,
I so far do not use it, so no problem ;-)
But I would like to see the functions addRefCP/subRefCP with old style Ptrs
still in 2.0 and a querying function for the Ref Count added for debugging.
This will not hurt the RefPtr<> users and I cannot follow your concerns
about querying the Ref Count.
Regards,
Christoph
Dirk Reiners wrote:
Hi everybody,
in the process of cleaning up things for 2.0 we've also been looking
into other systems, and everybody else (i.e. boost ;) uses the actual
object instead of the pointer as the template argument to the RefPtr
class.
How many people are using RefPtr<>'s, and and would it be a problem to
change the semantics? I think you can cover most cases with a simple
regexp, but I'm not sure what complicated constructs people use
internally.
Yours
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
