Hi Patrick,
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 17:08 -0500, Patrick Hartling wrote:
> I have done some more work on the new attachment type that I submitted for
> review earlier this week. The changes are as follows:
>
> * Added another attribute map attachment type that maps std::string to
> OSG::FieldContainerPtr (inspired by Marcus' comment and input from
> Allen Bierbaum and Dirk)
> * Reduced the number of free functions to two, both of which are used for
> easy retrieval of the attribute map attachment from an attachment
> container
> * Fixed the visibility to be external so that the attribute maps will be
> shared on a cluster and serialized correctly (thanks to Dirk for the
> clarification on that detail)
> * Added a public override of the const version of getKeys() so that user
> code can get read-only access to the keys in the attribute map
>
> The first of those is probably the Big New Thing. The test program for that
> code (testFCPtrAttributeMap.cpp) shows how a variety of field containers can
> be stored in a single attribute map. For example:
>
> OSG::beginEditCP(attr_map);
> (*attr_map)["transform attribute"] = OSG::Transform::create();
> (*attr_map)["geometry attribute"] = OSG::Geometry::create();
> (*attr_map)["material attribute"] = OSG::SimpleMaterial::create();
> OSG::endEditCP(attr_map);
>
> Comments or suggestions?
Nope, looks good. I've checked it in, thanks for your contribution!
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
