Hi Simon,
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:37 +0100, Simon Haegler wrote:
> > I also think libxml2 would be the right choice :-)
> > Has libxml++ still a glibmm dependency?
>
> yes, but only the 2.6 api, i'm currently using libxml++ 1.0...
Taking a quick look at the docs there seems to be little difference
between the 1 and 2 APIs. Do you know why the major version change was
done? Are there major deficiencies in 1?
I would like to avoid glibmm dependencies, as there is no glibmm
package, you have to use the full GTK/GTK+ one. That would be quite a
burden for people wanting to compile OpenSG on Windows... :(
I see that there is a patch being discussed in the libxml++ mailing list
that removes the glibmm dependency. But it's nasty: it typedef's
glib::ustring as std::string...
I'll try to get an update on what's going on there, in the worst case I
think we can just keep our own version of it.
Anybody else with objections to libxml2/libxml++?
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
