Hi all, there's a funny bug in the OSG_VERSION define in the current 1.x CVS: this is currently defined as 010800 (for 1.8 I suppose) but as it's beginning with a 0 the compiler assumes that it's an octal number and therefore can't really have 8 as digit... Maybe we should switch the number to 0x010800? How do other projects cope with it? I've only checked Mesa, that seems to have MAJOR, MINOR and PATCH numbers and for the main "version code" they are bitshifted and added together appropriately so it never begins with 0.
I'm a bit amused though that nobody else seems to have used it for checking the current OpenSG version in applications... :) Akos ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
