Hi, On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 09:05 -0500, Patrick Hartling wrote: > Andreas Zieringer wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > > looks like a bug. > > In OpenSG or in my code? > > > Running the cluster servers all the time is not a good > > idea. > > Why is that? > > > Better run a simple program (we use a minimal webserver service) > > which starts the cluster server. On disconnection exit the cluster server. > > I could do that, but I would like to understand why adding that complexity > is necessary first. Is it a resource usage issue, a design limitation of > OpenSG, or something else?
IIRC it started out as a design limitation in 1.x. Which should be solvable in 2.x. That is where the restarting wrapper came from. But the more important thing to keep in mind is I added the cluster code from the old 2.x cvs because Daniel said he is looking into porting it and he wasn't aware of it being in the old CVS. This code was not touched since mid 2005 and was not in the subversion repository because it was by far not finished, cleaned, well tested or ready. So if in doubt it most likely will be a problem with the cluster code as it is in 2.x right now. gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
