Hello Mathias,
the basic idea is to apply the modifications recorded in the changelist
so it can be cleared and does not grow too much.
Mathias Otto wrote:
> Thanks for your response, but I am using clustering and I don't know how this
> should work for the remote Aspect.
In that case you'd transmit the changes with RemoteAspect::sendSync.
> Nevertheless it makes me wondering, that the changelist is smaller, when I do
> load all objects, than I share the objects.
I'm only guessing here, but one possibility might be that loading all
objects creates different entries in the changelist and (since the
problem arises when a std::vector::push_back throws) the different
distribution of vector sizes might just work around that.
> Because now shareing the geometries works too.
I'm a bit unsure what you mean here, but it sounds as if you've overcome
the problem. If not, just keep asking questions :)
Carsten
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
