Marcus Lindblom wrote: > Allen Bierbaum wrote: > >> Marcus Lindblom wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We're discussing switching math-libs for our physics parts here at >>> Mentice. The guys seem pretty excited about GMTL (I tipped them off :), >>> so I'd like to ask if it's still on the roadmap for OpenSG 2.0? >>> >>> Also, I noticed that some the developers of GGT also appear this list, >>> so if you guys could comment on it's "liveness" and future, it would be >>> appreciated. >>> >>> >>> >> GMTL is alive and kicking. It suffers from the fact that is currently >> does everything we need and that the features we want to add aren't >> needed right away on any of our projects. :) >> >> > Good news! Which projects are you using it on currently? > VR Juggler and all the projects we use with VR Juggler. > Righto. Do you have a roadmap for things you'd like to add, so that we > can sync this with what we would like to see, or that we already have > and can easily integrate? > I would have to look, but I think most of this is just in our heads right now.
>> If there is interest in using it, then we are definitely interested in >> helping the effort. One of the first things I would do is make a >> standalone project out of it (outside GGT with it's own trac site, etc). >> >> > There might be. The guys here were a bit put off by an error > (lineseg<->point, which assumes an infinite line rather than a segment) > and were thus a bit worried if an "obvious" error in a simple algorithm > slipped through, how proven is the more advanced stuff? Are there any > unit-tests written for this or do you test as you go along? > There are quite a few unit tests, so I am surprised that this one fell through the cracks. > I think they can live with a few errors, if they can be fixed. The main > worry is liveness and progress (which seems to be just fine. :). If > issues are adressed and patches merged continously, I think they will be > quite happy. > I think there should not be many errors in algorithms. The core capabilities are unit tested and we have used it on a lot of projects. > Also, if they choose GMTL (for all physics here), it would be _very_ > nice if it was adopted for OpenSG 2.0, since then we have additional > leverage to shift to OpenSG for the other platform too. > > A trac site would be nice. These guys like Trac. :) > Now I just need time to set it up. -Allen > Cheers, > /Marcus > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Opensg-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
