Hi Allen,
Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> I was just writing some generic code where I need to lookup the RefPtr
> for an FC class given any class type and I noticed that there is no
> typedef for this tied into the class type. For example, Node::ObjPtr is
> a typedef for NodePtr, but there is not equivalent for RefPtr's. (I
> ended up using OSG::RefPtr<Class::ObjPtr>).
>
> I would like to suggest that the developers add a typedef for RefPtr as
> well. I would do it myself but I can't seem to understand where all the
> typedefs are actually coming from. There seem to be some in ClassBase,
> some in Class, some in ClassFields and even within those there seem to
> be duplicates. It may even be possible to remove some of this
> duplication and reduce the number of times that PointerBuilder<> is called.
>
> Anyway, what do people think, would a typedef for RefPtr's in the class
> be useful to anyone but me?
Absolutely. But I have to admit I don't understand all those structs either, so
I will have to defer that to Gerrit...
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users