Hi, On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 14:31 -0500, Patrick Hartling wrote: > Allen Bierbaum wrote: > > Patrick Hartling wrote: > > > > Is there something similar for gcc? > > In general, I don't think you'll find other debug runtime implementations > similar to what Visual C++ includes. At least I haven't seen it with other > compilers. You could compile GLIBC (or other libc implementation) with debug > symbols, but the run-time checks that the Visual C++ debug runtime does are > not necessarily going to be there. The salient point here is that there is a > difference between building object files with debug symbols and using the > Visual C++ debug runtime.
for gcc (unix systems) not to the extend described but IIRC gcc libs/includes react to NDEBUG. > > As it stands right now, OpenSG 2.0 is setup like this: > > > > (see OSGConfig.h) > > > > #ifdef _DEBUG > > #define OSG_DEBUG > > #endif > > > > > > Anyone have ideas for a good fix? > > Debug OSG_DEBUG explicitly in the build when debugging features are desired. > I'm fine with this one. kind regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
