Andreas Zieringer wrote: > Hi Marcus, > >> Andreas Zieringer wrote: >> >> True. It's not that bad, it just took me a while to figure out. I also >> had to compile OpenSG twice since I got an error at link time. > > I don't get this one after removing the old supportlibs directory scons > should unzip the supportlibs.zip and just re-link everything.
Yup. But I compiled it first, it failed to link. I then figured out what was wrong, removed the dir and _recompiled everything again_ and then linking worked. > I don't trust date stamps. Right. >> Another way is to simply rename the supportlibs every time it's updated, >> adding a version to the name, then unpack it if it doesnt exist and >> remove all old versions. We do something similar for our third-party >> libs in svn. > > hmm I don't like that as this would change the support libs include path > and lead to a recompilation of a lot of files. True. Didn't think of that. > I just made some tests and added a VERSION file to the supportlibs.zip file. > > amz-amd64: win% time unzip -p supportlibs.zip VERSION > 1.0 > real 0m0.050s > user 0m0.030s > sys 0m0.046s > > looks quite fast ;-) Right. You got me there. :-) Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
