Patrick Hartling wrote: > On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Marcus Lindblom wrote: >> Ok? But.. the trac browser shows absolutely no commits other than a copy >> to create the branch from trunk? >> >> https://realityforge.vrsource.org/trac/pyopensg/changeset/540/branches/trunk_update >> > > Ah, this shows just how accurate my memory of that work is. I haven't > committed my work because it didn't compile. I don't normally check in > things that I know are not working. I can check it in since it's on a > branch and won't necessarily impact anyone.
Thanks! That gives me a starting point at least. >> Yup, but it seemed as if the osgmodule_... file was handcrafted, and >> I've mainly worked with that as a start. > > It is generated, although it is generated by gen_bindings.py rather than > by Py++. Ok. I'll have to dig a bit deeper. :) > I would favor merging the remaining changes from the fcptr_stable_jun07 > branch to the trunk. That may require some code reviews and/or > discussion among interested parties. That said, the revision that I am > about to commit removes the generated code for OSG::PerfMonitor, > OSG::DoubleTransform, and other pieces that are not present on the > trunk. It is regrettable, but it's the best that I have to offer at the > moment. The relevant pieces in gen_bindings.py are still there, but they > are commented out. We don't need those ATM, so I can live with it for a while. Hopefully everything will migrate into trunk eventually. Cheers. /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
