(slightly offtopic)

Carsten Neumann wrote:
>     Hello David,
> 
>> - only enable memory debugging on the debug version.  (does this mean I
>> have run scons twice, once for debug and once for optimized?)
> 
> yes, there is some support for building multiple variants in one go, but it 
> does have some problems and it is generally less painful to just run scons 
> twice.
> However, since this is not the only thing that is not entirely smooth with 
> the scons build, Gerrit has started looking into using cmake and since that 
> affects the build dependencies of the packages you might wait a couple of 
> days more until we know whether we go that route or not.

IIUC, CMake doesn't offer that capability either. You set options, then 
run a configure pass to generate makefiles, then use your local tools to 
compile it, according to the set flags. At least for cmake with msvs, 
all configs (debug/release/etc) get the same flags, so you actually need 
to change flags, generate & recompile again. And you'd better specify a 
different directory so you don't overwrite your project-files (which 
makes msvs do a complete recompile).

But the other issues might overshadow that. It'd be interesting to hear 
what Gerrit comes up with. Further discussion on the core-list?

Cheers,
/Marcus


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users

Reply via email to