Hi,
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 22:44 -0500, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> Hello Gerrit,
>
> Gerrit Voß rote:
> > I am against adding another binary format. One is I think enough.
> > IMHO we should at least (re)add the FieldContainer based read/writes to
> > the {OSG|OSB} SceneFileTypes. I'm not sure if I want to push it through
> > the whole SceneFileHandler infrastructure.
>
> just to be sure, do you mean basically adding the same interface I just
> added to OSBDriver to the {OSB,OSG}SceneFileHandler as well or did you
> mean an interface the takes/returns a vector of FieldContainer like Dirk
> suggested upthread?
Yes, for OSG I also added something to read a single FieldContainer
(needed it for the csm). Let me check with OSG how it should look like,
than it should not be a problem to push it to OSB.
kind regards
gerrit
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
