Hello Michael,

On 09/08/2011 09:25 AM, Michael Raab wrote:
> seems that you modified the patch for OSGSurface.cpp that I sent you.

yes, sorry, I wanted to avoid the performance penalty of using the 
generic access functions for the control points since their exact type 
is known.

> I'm not able to compile it with the current CVS version. I did another fix 
> based on your change. Patch is attached.

thanks, I've also adjusted the if(pPos != NullFC) case right above to 
also use const_iterators instead of the generic access functions.

        Cheers,
                Carsten

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop 
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users

Reply via email to