If you got it from that path, it should be correct. It's important to understand that the revision numbers are shared among branches, so 8891 and 8892 could well be from differing branches, and thus reflect wildly differing functionalitites. Best regards, Stefan Andersson Tribal Media AB
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:37:29 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Opensim-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 78 > > Stefan, > > have done that and got the sources from > http://opensimulator.org/svn/opensim/branches/0.6.4-rc1/. > > It identifies themselves as 8891, is that correct ? > > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:12:46 +0100 > From: Stefan Andersson <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Report on 0.6.4-rc1? (Stefan Andersson) > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Excellent, thank you. Could you try the /branches/0.6.4-rc strain? it's not > actually 8732, but I've just upped the version numbers on it. > > > Best regards, > Stefan Andersson > Tribal Media AB > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
