Melanie wrote:
actually i'd take the opposite approach and make it part of the user service and make it more general. just because lindens had the idea of providing profile information is not bad per se. profile information is a useful tool, certainly in the corporate environment. i agree that the current way it's structured is not good.Currently, profile information is handled in part by the user server and in part by the profiles module. This data really has no business in the user server, because it is Linden client specific, furthermore, it should not be split between two services. The profile information in the user server is a legacy of a quick fix to get a profile picture and text working before we had a real profile service. It would be quite foolish to pollute a new, clean architectural approach with such legacy data and Lindenisms, DrS/dirk MelanieJustin Clark-Casey wrote: -- dr dirk husemann ---- math & computer science ---- ibm zurich research lab RL: [email protected] - +41 44 724 8573 - http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~hud/ SL: [email protected] --------------------- http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/ |
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
