Well, we tentatively agreed that we'd break things badly between 0.6.9 and 0.7. There is already a nonlinear change to Migrations, and I think we should use the opportunity to do the breaks we have to do.
In this context the major interface number has no meaning - no one should use this in production yet. I'm not opposed to bumping it, I'd actually thought about it briefly, then I said "why?", since we already have breaks in the upgrade path that aren't guarded. Whole Hawg or None. Melanie Justin Clark-Casey wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> The branch, master has been updated >> via 9b22393 Add a field asset_flags and a corresponding enum to the >> asset database. This >> from c1fe07b * Added missing loggout notification to home grid upon >> agents logging out in foreign grids. >> >> Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have >> not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those >> revisions in full, below. >> >> - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> commit 9b22393cf308507dc751704c8b0d3e65ac1d4323 >> Author: Melanie <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun May 9 17:02:22 2010 +0100 >> >> Add a field asset_flags and a corresponding enum to the asset database. >> This >> CHANGES THE ASSET SERVER PROTOCOL and means you CAN NOT MIX PRIOR >> VERSIONS >> WITH LATER ONES. It may also eat your babies, yada, yada, yada. >> The usual cautions for migrations to the assets table apply. >> Coding: Can not guarantee nut free. > > Should this require a bump in the MajorInterfaceVersion in VersionInfo, > Melanie? > _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
