Hi, Justin Clark-Casey wrote: > On 07/08/10 16:42, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Would it be ok to make a 0.7.1 release fairly soon based on the current >> 0.7-post-fixes branch? Over these past 2 weeks there have been several >> bug fixes for 0.7 that might be worth a tag of its own. > > Could we call this 0.7.0.1 instead? That way, 0.7.1 is still logically the > next release branched from master. I think > 0.7.0.1 fairly clearly conveys "bug fix release on 0.7". >
+1 on micro micro numbers. Or, use 0.7.1-1, 0.7.1-2, like the RPM packager. >> >> It might be a good practice to start doing this systematically, i.e. >> N.x.0 releases featuring feature additions, and N.x.y (y>0) featuring >> bug fixes. > > We could do this but then we approach 1.0 very rapidly (0.8, 0.9, ...) which > would imply some kind of 'completion' and I > think that we're still some way off that point. > > We could go into 0.10, 0.11, 0.12, ... but this seems to be confusing for > people. > Agreed, but is IS being done, if it's needed, so can we. But micro micro (nano?) numbering is better. Melanie _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
