At 00:46 02/11/2010, Crista Lopes <[email protected]> wrote:
Whatever the original legal advice was, it resulted in the current rules described here:
http://opensimulator.org/wiki/Contributions_Policy

For the past year or so, we have been consulting informally with a lawyer based in San Diego who is very much inside the issues. When we inquired about relaxing the restrictive rules, including the 6-month quarantine, he reinforced the need for those rules.


The policy as written assumes GPL Second Life Viewer code, which of course has now changed to LGPL. That makes all the difference. I totally agree we cannot accept contributions based on any virally defined GPL code base, as the contributions policy very appropriately states, and should continue to state.

I personally don't think a lawyer is needed to read and act on LGPL... and don't see what we gain by having them read things given that we act as individuals and not a LLC anyway. But if any lawyer gave input out of the goodness of their heart, the main question is whether they gave advice on the basis of the change of licence terms (already in place) for the SL Viewer code which was announced a few months ago and is now within the last month implemented by a change of the licence file within the viewer sources.

That's why I think a change of policy is now possible, and should be done immediately before communities branch off on the assumption that the OpenSim policy will continue to exclude them.







_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

Reply via email to