Hello Well i was also badly surprised by the sit change. But at the one of a long discussion on OSG forum i have realized that if someone has right to vote for stabilizing it would be the devs.
>From my RL work i know that the more stable the project is is the less fun is work on it and the more it becomes hard/boring job. The reason is simple. Your hands are tightly tied up by the current code. Before you start to implement any idea you have to study the current code, all possible running modes, interactions and tons of other things whose may be affected by your code. In many cases you even need approval to start with something. Trust me, this can be sometime a totally disgusting process. So the devs needs own high motivation to do such hard work and the team leader needs to be sure that his team is ready/motivated for it. Like most of other users i would love to see OS more stable than SL is. But i know we can not force the devs by votes or something else into it. On the other side. Isn't it working already good enough? Isn't it enough to have all the sources codes so anyone can choose only patches he likes? Is someone really forced to upgrade? Not sure how for someone else. But my answers to above questions are giving me the patience to wait for the devs to initiate the process them selves. Hoover the vote idea sounds to me in another way. What about having a vote system for features where users can vote by DONATIONS. And pay part of the donation to a dev who would implement it? Best wishes, Bo On Thursday 01 of December 2011 13:32:57 Jason Spriggs wrote: > My idea: In the next few days ill try to make a script to allow for users > to report what they think is most important and then vote upon what is the > most important thing(s) to have before turning into beta. > > Thoughts? Reply. _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
