To be more accurate, with 7 regions up, it's using just around 1GB out of the 2GB of memory, same as 2.1 was. That's with only a couple of users, though, which is all I need. I'll keep an eye on that, and see what memory it's been using in the case of another crash.
One thing worth noting is that CPU usage is a *lot* lower under 2.2, including when the server's just ticking over with no users. Just observations - thanks to all for your input on this. John Mic Bowman wrote: >GC may also be a problem. Though my experience with 2.4 at least is >that memory utilization is very good and in this case we have... "more >than enough" memory. :-) > >Also... the consistency with which the problem occurs in log4net >methods called from within an executing script suggests that its not >just garbage collection. I'm not sufficiently mono-smart to root cause >this... so I'm looking for bandaids (which in this case amounts to >commenting out log4net calls in the call stack that caused the >problem) that work consistently. If someone with mono-smarts would >like to suggest some other ways to get data on this, I'm more than >willing to try something different. > >--mic > >On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:09 AM, BlueWall Slade ><[email protected]> wrote: >> I tested the 2.2/2.4 waters and regressed back to 2.0.1 . But, I did find >> that the 2.2/2.4 works much better if you can keep some headroom in RAM. >> Things seem to take a turn for the worse when you start swapping. Maybe the >> GC has a hard time dealing with cached pages? >> >> Thanks! >> BlueWall >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:53 AM, John Hopkin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Dr Scofield wrote: >>> >>> >John Hopkin wrote: >>> >> I've just upgraded Mono from 2.1 to 2.2 under Ubuntu Hardy, using Dr >>> >> Scofield's script from here: >>> >> >>> >> http://xyzzyxyzzy.net/2009/02/17/updated-mono-build-script-mono-22/ >>> > >>> >i've found that 2.2 has major problems and have since gone back to 2.0.1. >>> > >>> >i'll add a comment to the blog, sorry about not doing it earlier. >>> >>> I'd really, really like to stay on 2.2 if possible - under 2.1, the >>> setup had recently become so slow and temperamental it was practically >>> unusable, which is why I tried the upgrade. With 2.2, this problem >>> aside, there've been none of the performance issues, and generally >>> it's a *lot* smoother than it has been for months. >>> -- >>> John Hopkin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensim-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensim-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users >> >> -- John Hopkin _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
