Adam, your reply got truncated. In the past I've found your posts to be well thought out so I'd encourage you to repost your thoughts. I for one would like to hear them.
Mike -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frisby, Adam Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Opensim-users] Free objects (dmu1 and dmu2 .IAR files) > I'm far less comfortable with your earlier assertion that in the > absence of a license its safe to assume something is in the public > domain. Especially since you cited patent law which really doesn't > apply to electronic content anyway. Personally I'd prefer that if a > repository mechanism is set up it require that a license is asserted > for anything that goes into it. If I put something up I'm stating that > I have the right to do so and under what terms. I suppose you could > have a "use at your own risk" repository for things where the creator > is unknown. I'd personally never use something from such a repo... This. _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
