Hi, thanx for the encouragement. Not really being a coder, I feel I want to contribute somehow.
My fun little boilerplate on the top of the page is a not-quite-serious jab at the "that-vaguely-resembles-my-one-you-stole-my-idea-you-content-thief" hysteria that has been present on SL-exchange (now X-Street SL) as long as I have been using the service (though I have never had it directed at me). Though, in Australian Law at least (we all know the USA is legally weird :-P ), what I said is all true AFAIK. I have more to worry about from Australia's newly infamous net-porn thought-crime laws for this set! :-/ I considered a CC license for these, but I really want these to be fully Public Domain, if only because they were so easy to produce from well- established memes, that to claim any rights over them at all would be plain silly. I have other stuff I will be releasing (one day) under other licenses because they took me more than five minutes of slack time between service call-outs at work to make. Again, thanks for the feedback. Lae On Saturday May 22 2010 15:42:31 Karen Palen wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:08 PM, James Stallings II < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > For what it's worth: > > > > I am probably one of those referred to as 'various "authorities"'. > > Actually to judge by your posting I would class you as one of the "voices > of reason" LOL > > A review of the various Second Life blogs and newsletters shows the sad > state of affairs in Second Life right now. "reason" and "due process" seem > to be the > > I am not aware of any of the hysteria and vigilantism spreading to the > OpenSim grids - YET! > > I only hope that it never does, and my posting was/is intended to aid that > goal. > > Karen _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
