It's a pitty there is no alternative to LSL or maybe a way to use an "enhanced" LSL which uses better stuctures.
It seems like LSL is aiming to the lowest common factor with the concept that not everyone is a programmer so it should be accessible to those who are not. Asaff On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:06 PM Jeff Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > At 1:13 PM -0700 2/20/19, Serendipity Seraph wrote: > > >I have run into some grids that are worried by a reported lack of > >limitation on what C# classes and methods can be called. Does anyone > have > >more detail on this? It doesn't seem to me that putting in a script > >scanner that would limit what calls to C# can and cannot go through would > >be all that difficult. So is the problem at the least over-inflated? > Is > >the concern out of date or misplaced? > > > I did some C# scripting years ago (computing, displaying black body > spectra in real time). Speed boost over LSL was x10. > > Speed gain is much smaller today. Although i can no longer execute > the C# version, the LSL version which ran in 1.8s in 2011 is now > around a half second. > > I also did some UDP communication, now replaced with HTTP which can > be awesomely fast. > > The pain of LSL is still lack of data structures and modularity. > > And it is a huge pain. > > > -- Jeff > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users > _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list [email protected] http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
