Hi Varun, Just had a look at the repository. The ipv6 branch is old - the last update was 02 Mar 2004.
All the recent work has gone into the trunk, so I recommend you start with that, and report any problems here. BTW, you don't say what OS/version you're trying to build it on. Regards, Richard Morrell -----Original Message----- From: Varun Chandramohan [mailto:var...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] Sent: 07 April 2010 05:21 To: openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: John Calcote Subject: Re: [Openslp-devel] Regd Status Of New Release Of OpenSLP 2.0 Hi John, I played around with the tree a bit and the problem i reported earlier still persists. I think the ipv6 tree is broken. Iam not able to compile anything on top of this. Can you please fix this issue? The main problem i figured is due to missing AC_CONFIG_HEADERS in configure.in file. Some of the stable versions seems to have them. autoheader: error: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in autoheader done However iam no expert in autoconf details. As far i can see after the autogen.sh which throws up this error, i try to do an "./configure" checking for strcasecmp... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: error: cannot find input file: Makefile.in So it seems like a bug to me. I can make the stable versions in svn tree work. Can you please look into this? or do i have to open up a bug report? Regards, Varun On Tuesday 06 Apr 2010 9:41:44 am Varun Chandramohan wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for the reply. I downloaded the svn repo and i found > a huge number of slp versions in it. Since iam concentrating on ipv6 > related patches i decided to take ~/openslp/branches/ipv6/openslp for > testing. I think this has all the patches fixed. I noticed that iam not > able to build this branch. > When i do > r...@localhost openslp]# autoconf > configure.in:5: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. > See the Autoconf documentation. > configure.in:57: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL > configure.in:116: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL > configure.in:117: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LEX > > If i follow the autogen.sh procedure > [r...@localhost openslp]# ./autogen.sh > alocal done > autoheader: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', > `config.h.bot' autoheader: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates > for `config.h.in' autoheader: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged. > autoheader: > autoheader: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and > autoheader: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows one to define a template > without > autoheader: WARNING: `acconfig.h': > autoheader: > autoheader: WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1, > autoheader: [Define if a function `main' is needed.]) > autoheader: > autoheader: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see > the > autoheader: WARNING: documentation. > autoheader: error: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in > autoheader done > autoconf done > configure.in:5: installing `./install-sh' > configure.in:116: required file `./ltmain.sh' not found > configure.in:5: installing `./missing' > common/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp' > automake done > libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. > libtoolize: linking file `./ltmain.sh' > libtoolize: Consider adding `AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])' to configure.in and > libtoolize: rerunning libtoolize, to keep the correct libtool macros > in-tree. libtoolize: Consider adding `-I m4' to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in > Makefile.am. libtoolize done > > Now type 'configure' and 'make' to compile openslp. You can do this > in a separate build directory if you wish > > > This also does not allow me to compile. If i type make i get into libtool > version mismatch errors. Please help. I want to urgently get this code > working to test. > > Regards, > Varun > > On Tuesday 30 Mar 2010 9:59:12 pm John Calcote wrote: > > Varun, > > > > I seem to have no trouble getting to the two links you mentioned. > > Perhaps sf.net was down for a while when you tried. I seem to recall > > reading an email recently from them that stated that they'd have some > > planned down time for a while. > > > > John > > > > On 3/30/2010 5:19 AM, Varun Chandramohan wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > May i know when i can expect the new stable release of > > > OpenSLP 2.0? I see that its still in beta stage. I have been running > > > some tests on openslp 2.0 and found a few bugs. Iam fixing them and ill > > > submit the bugs to the tracker soon. Mean while i tried to make patch > > > for the first bug on top of current svn. But iam facing the first > > > problem > > > > > > va...@varuncha:~/2009-projects$ svn co > > > https://openslp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openslp openslp > > > svn: PROPFIND of '/svnroot/openslp': could not connect to server > > > (https://openslp.svn.sourceforge.net) > > > > > > Is there something wrong? I have used git before never svn. So do let > > > me know. -- Regards, Varun Chandramohan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel This email, including any attachment, is a confidential communication intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. It contains information which is private and may be proprietary or covered by legal professional privilege. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender upon receipt, and immediately delete it from your system. Anything contained in this email that is not connected with the businesses of this company is neither endorsed by nor is the liability of this company. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachment to this email has been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses, and would advise that you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
