Thanks for the reply Nick. So if no once else have any problem, can you commit 
this patch?

Regards,
Varun
On Saturday, August 28, 2010 12:55:39 am Nick Wagner wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long to respond.  Yes, the changes for MTU seem to be
> there.  I see you decided to keep the InitializeMTUPropertyValue function
> and added some global properties rather than just changing
> SLPNetworkSetSendRecvBuf,
> but I have no real objections.  Does anyone else have some opinions about
> the code?
> 
> --Nick
> 
> 2010/8/26 Varun Chandramohan <var...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 03:39:11 pm Venkateswara R Puvvada wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> >            I think Venkat has updated the new changes for MTU as you
> > specified. Is that acceptable? Is this code ready to go in?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Varun
> >
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users 
worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and 
speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel

Reply via email to