On 12/09/2010 04:50 PM, Morrell Richard (external) wrote:
> I presume by "DA service requests" you mean queries for
> service:directory-agent.
Yes, I did. Sorry.
> The daemon checks the scope list, and replies if it is empty, or if its
> scope matches.
>
> Hence, a DA query with an empty scope list is used to elicit replies from
> all DAs regardless of their scopes.
But if a lot of different scopes are used, this causes unnecessary 
network traffic, because the querying slpd is only interesting in DAs 
with the same scope(s). Or am I wrong?

     Roel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roel van de Kraats [mailto:r...@advancedcargo.eu]
> Sent: 09 December 2010 15:14
> To: 'openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: [Openslp-devel] Scope list in SRVRQST
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I noticed that slpd sends DA service requests with an empty scope list,
> even when the scope(s) are explicitly defined in the configuration. In
> MakeActiveDiscoveryRqst() the scope list is left empty.
>
> Why is this? Should this be fixed?
>
> Best regards,
>       Roel
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> This SF Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> WikiLeaks The End of the Free Internet
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/therealnews-com
> _______________________________________________
> Openslp-devel mailing list
> Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
>
> This email, including any attachment, is a confidential communication
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed. It contains information which is private and may be proprietary
> or covered by legal professional privilege. If you have received this email
> in error, please notify the sender upon receipt, and immediately delete it
> from your system.
>
> Anything contained in this email that is not connected with the businesses
> of this company is neither endorsed by nor is the liability of this company.
>
> Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachment to
> this email has been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any
> damage sustained as a result of software viruses, and would advise that you
> carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Openslp-devel mailing list
> Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel

Reply via email to