My understanding is that 1. any SPI provider will be able to load a module, and process requests as if it was a module on their own network. 1a. we may see some social network viruses because of this. If you do not lock your server up correctly, the module proxy may open you up to new attacks. 1b. as demonstrated by defcon 15, you might be able to use multiple proxies to cause some really interesting effects.
2. with google gadgets, you can host your files on google's version of geocities, but if you want to render dynamic content it will have to be hosted locally, and may even require a separate sign-on process unless you are able to process google's signon tokens which are new to Framework from google gadget framework. This seems like a version 2 of openID? On Nov 6, 7:18 am, nokacer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a few questions about Google's OpenSocial: > > 1) When the SPI comes out and (ALL) social networks (and not just > google Partners) can finally have OpenSocial Applications in their > sites, how will this applications be included in the site, will be it > thourgh Syndication like Google Gadgets? (i.e using "http:// > gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=linktoxmlfile" > > 2) Will social networks be able to host the files OpenSocial Apps > need? (such as opensocial.js and related) or do they always have to > use the files hosted in google servers --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenSocial Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
