As far as I understand any data transfered from the module definition source and further loads and ajax calls (_IG_Fetch*) is passed or filtered through a proxy box.
If that is the case then any data is sent to somewhere which is neither controlled by the social network nor by the gadget developer. Why is the system designed like this? Who wants to peek every bit requested from any gadget? With respect to performance this also not the best solution. I would rather allow direct client gadget communication or filtering through the social network servers but no filtering by third party servers. Hopefully, I simply did not understand the system architecture right and someone from the builders could drop me a correction or an alternative method. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenSocial Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
