On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:51:23PM +0100, Reinoud Elhorst wrote: > Thanks Paul, > > I was about to suggest creating something like this! We'll be sure to use > this (and/or any other testsuite), and contribute any tests that we feel are > not covered once we feel we have the implementation right! > > I'm wondering whether this should be part of Shindig, and I think so. A > reference implementation is most useful when accompanied by a lot of tests > that confirm any other implementation is "correct".
Yes, I'd like to contribute this to Shindig so it can be used to validate any container once it's cleaned up. I've been slowly adding 0.7 conformance tests, but there are many, many more to add. > Or would these tests be mainly focussed on implementing containers (assuming > an already correct gadget server)? > (Since a sample container is part of > Shindig as well, I still think the tests should be in there as well...) The test gadget is usable on Orkut and Hi5. It would take some reworking to get it to work on MySpace. Only a small amount of tests work in the Sample Container at present. Feel free to try it out and suggest improvements. Regards, Paul -- Paul Lindner hi5 Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpVBN7DbNSwp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
