i hope so, but google will most likely not be the ones to fix it.
these same problems existed in may of 2007 on Google Gadgets.  for
some reason goolge has it out for flash, and only supports it when
they have to.

i would really like to see embedFlash working as good if not better
than swfObject1-5.
due to IE issues with local/external connection swfFix should also be
included in embedFlash.

I also can not stand that we are forced to use ie in quirks mode based
on the doctype, but that is another thread.

On Mar 5, 1:35 am, rush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi jdavid
>
> Thanks for your help.
> It is working today but giving the same error when i m using
> embedCachedFlash instead of embedFlash.
> One more question, will flashvars feature work in future?
>
> Regards
> Rush
>
> On Mar 5, 5:38 am, "jdavid.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it looks like _IG_ calls are being migrated to a better namespace.  I
> > would avoid them.
>
> > How do you get your error?  I might take a screenshot and post.  that
> > looks like a regular expression.  Something is breaking in flash or in
> > the make request object.
>
> > Does your url already have # or a ? in it?  Its hard to help in the
> > blind on this one.
>
> > do you have firebug?  can you debug it?
>
> > On Mar 4, 1:06 am, rush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for reply.
>
> > > @ Paul
> > > I tried gadgets.flash.embedCachedFlash instead of
> > > gadgets.flash.embedFlash but it is giving error "Error: D.match(/^[^?#]
> > > +\//) has no properties"
>
> > > @ jdavid
> > > I tried the option2 but it is also giving the same error "Error:
> > > D.match(/^[^?#]+\//) has no properties"
>
> > > I want to ask one more question, if i will use  _IG_EmbedFlash instead
> > > of gadgets.flash.embedFlash, is it ok? which one is the better way?
>
> > > Regards
> > > Rush
>
> > > On Mar 4, 5:46 am, "jdavid.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > actually this feature is broken.
>
> > > > if you try to add a param that is unrecognized by embedFlash, it will
> > > > not add it as a parameter tag.
>
> > > > we found there are 2 better ways to load the swf file right now.
>
> > > > option1.
>
> > > > use swfObject1-5 it has a superior interface and is more fault
> > > > tolerant when it comes to browsers, the downside is that getting 100%
> > > > width and 100% height properties is tough with swfObject1-5.  if you
> > > > want to cache the flash file(its slow right now) you will want to do a
> > > > getProxyUrl on your swf location url first, and then send that string
> > > > to swfObject1-5.
>
> > > > var url = "http://yourdomain.com/file.swf";;
> > > >      url = gadget.io.getProxyUrl(url);
>
> > > > option2.
>
> > > > use the broken embedFlash function, but encode flashvars in the url.
> > > > if the settings change, then it will re-cahce the swft object.
> > > > DO NOT DO THIS WITH PRIVATE DATA!!!
> > > > but in the case of a userid, you are probably fine.
>
> > > > var url          = "http://yourdomain.com/file.swf";;
> > > > var flashvars = "var1=value1&var2=value2";
>
> > > >      url          = url + "?" + flashvars ;   //adds flash vars to
> > > > your url
>
> > > > option 1 + 2
>
> > > > var url          = "http://yourdomain.com/file.swf";;
> > > > var flashvars = "var1=value1&var2=value2";
>
> > > >      url          = url + "?" + flashvars ;
>
> > > >      url          = gadget.io.getProxyUrl(url); //proxy encode your url
> > > > +flashvars
>
> > > > right now there are a few options that are only available through
> > > > swfObject like
>
> > > > allowFullScreen               //allows the flash widget to go full
> > > > screen, esc always exits fullscreen, and keyboard becomes disabled as
> > > > input into flash
> > > > allowScriptAccess           //defines the javascript flash bridge
> > > > allowNetworking               //defines local connection access
>
> > > > embedFlash will not let you set these params either by design or by
> > > > flaw, either way its not there.  I think it should be there because of
> > > > adobe's overly restrictive security models, that are far more strict/
> > > > annoying than javascript.
>
> > > > On Mar 3, 7:10 am, rush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi all,
>
> > > > > I want to pass username to swf file. It was working fine when i use
> > > > > _IG_EmbedCachedFlash, but pass blank when use
> > > > > gadgets.flash.embedFlash. I am using following code, is it ok or have
> > > > > some mistake.
>
> > > > > gadgets.flash.embedFlash(url, "flashComponent", {
> > > > >                                         swf_version: 8,width:800,
> > > > >                                         height: 600,
> > > > >                                         id: "flashid",
> > > > >                                         flashvars: 'username='+ 
> > > > > _esc(username)
>
> > > > >                                         })
>
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Rush- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenSocial Application Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to