John Panzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 3 Nov 2007 15:40:45 >My personal take is that there shouldn't be any problem in adding >additional optional fields using the defined Atom extension mechanisms, >though obviously you can't expect every container to honor them.
And if you're a Container, you can't expect every Gadget to understand them. > It >would be helpful to have a forum for discussing such extensions so that >no one reinvents the wheel, and I think that would be one good use of >this mailing list (and the API mailing list of course). In which case I'd recommend that everyone uses and expects the foaf and vcard namespaces. vcard http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0# foaf http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ and probably geo http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos dc http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ But only use these as well as elements from gd, not instead of. -- Julian Bond E&MSN: julian_bond at voidstar.com M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 Webmaster: http://www.ecademy.com/ T: +44 (0)192 0412 433 Personal WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/ skype:julian.bond?chat *** Just Say No To DRM *** --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenSocial Container Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-container?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
