That's a good point. Right now, things are still ambiguous. Google Gadgets is the way to go for testing right now to get our feet wet.
But it's an API at the end of the day, and really, it won't be restricted to ggadgets. I wonder how everything will unfold. On Nov 5, 11:53 pm, Julian Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > murtada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:04:38 > > >You probably want to support Google Gadgets, since opensocial apps > >will be written as google gadgets in general. > > Once the Data APIs firm up, I wonder if this is true. I see a lot of > correspondence between the Twitter API and the Data APIs and Twitter has > spawned a *lot* of purely external Apps and Mashups. > > http://twitter.pbwiki.com/ > > -- > Julian Bond E&MSN: julian_bond at voidstar.com M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 > Webmaster: http://www.ecademy.com/ T: +44 (0)192 0412 433 > Personal WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/ skype:julian.bond?chat > *** Just Say No To DRM *** --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenSocial Container Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-container?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
