ok, thanks.

On Dec 2, 7:12 pm, Chris Chabot <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm this is quickly running outside of my area of expertise, I'm not
> terribly familiar with the current internals of the gadget<>container rpc
> structure.
>
> I think it would be best if you took this question to the shindig-dev list,
> where our resident experts on this topic can be found, 
> seehttp://incubator.apache.org/shindig/community/getting-help.htmlfor details
> on how to sign up
>
>    -- Chris
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Mel Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks Chris for your patience:)
>
> > Actually I'm diving into the code...I've found something that leaves a
> > mess..
>
> > I'm debugging the entire code to have a notion of shindig - partuza
> > interaction flow, and
> > that is what I found..
>
> > gadgets.json.stringify function (..rps/wpm.transport.js) changes the
> > entire rpc object structure... I mean that some fields of that object
> > (i.e the array containing
> > title, body and message type) are getting changed ...hence in my
> > container.js (partuza's) in requestSendMessage function(that I should
> > implement) I can get only the recipient, but no message to proceed.
>
> > something is wrong with my code:( or I'm doing so..
>
> > On Dec 2, 3:13 pm, Chris Chabot <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mel Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > requestSendMessage: function() {
>
> > > > }
>
> > > > this is what I need..
>
> > > Well, there you send stuff! :-)
>
> > > Really the implementation details are completely up to you, if you wanted
> > to
> > > add this functionality to partuza I would suggest adding a new controller
> > > (partuza/Application/Controllers) that can receive the message post, and
> > > just do a simple Ajax post to that url (suggestion: do include the
> > security
> > > token so you can validate it's not a abuse of the functionality, and can
> > > retrieve or compare the app id and viewer id).
>
> > > I know that probably doesn't sound like a useful suggestion, but there's
> > > just no replacing actually diving into the code and figuring it out to
> > see
> > > how it works
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Implementing OpenSocial Containers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<opensocial-container%2Bun 
> > [email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-container?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Implementing OpenSocial Containers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-container?hl=en.


Reply via email to