Please use os:PersonAppDataRequest On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, sunnydiv <[email protected]> wrote:
> > requesting a reply/answer > in data pipelining > > how do we get app data / presistant data > > On Mar 9, 10:54 pm, sunnydiv <[email protected]> wrote: > > the previous version @ > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc5qrdst_19fbb8fpd3 > > > > says : > > <os:PersonAppDataRequest> - request to get app data > > * @key {string} > > * @userid {list<string>} Comma delimited IDs of the users to use > > with "@groupid". Each item can be one of "@me", "@viewer", "@owner", > > or a user ID. Defaults to "@viewer'. Optional. > > * @groupid {string} The group of users to get app data for. > > Defaults to "@self", which returns the actual users listed in @userid. > > Other values are "@friends" to get friends, or any other string to get > > an arbitrary group. Optional. > > * @dataKeys {list<String>} List of keys for which to get data. > > * returns an array of OpenSocial app data objects, keyed by userid > > Example: > > <os:PersonAppDataRequest key="MyFriendsPets" userid="@viewer" > > groupid="@friends" dataKeys="pets,petNames"/> > > > > which makes sense, > > so what would we use in lieu of it > > > > On Mar 9, 10:50 pm, sunnydiv <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > in the Data Pipelining wikihttp:// > wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Data_Pipelining#Tag:_.3Cos... > > > > > i see > > > ' # <os:PersonAppDataRequest> - not needed due to Radically simplify > > > the Persistence/AppDataAPI ' > > > > > and the page after the jump says > > > " Summary > > > Simplify the API used to get/setappdata. " > > > > > .... umm WHAT ? > > > are we still using JS to get app data ? > > > > > i dont understand this one, > > > can anyone post an example ? > > > > > On Mar 9, 8:59 pm, Apurv Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Anatoly, > > > > The usage of @app that you have won't work. What you are really > trying to do > > > > is to navigate to profile view. We'll be implementing > os:NavigateToView to > > > > take of these issues. Please refer to the blog post and the section > on > > > > missing features. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -apurv > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, anatoly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I don't pass @app to my server in this app. > > > > > > > Here is my xml with 5 lines of code for profile view: > > > > >http://www.vandalismpro.com/opensocial/orkut.xml > > > > > > > I don't see any profile box in sandbox. It was announced that > profile > > > > > templates should work @ sandbox. > > > > > > > Any idea why it's not working? > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 12:33 pm, Apurv Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > You can use HttpRequest and pass @app in a parameter to generate > the > > > > > right > > > > > > view. You can test if things are working by using the canvas > view.Profile > > > > > > views for compliant apps will be enabled in a few weeks. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:54 PM, anatoly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I need to pass it actually. > > > > > > > So I just add @app as id and that should work? > > > > > > > > > One of my apps has a very simple html profile view with app id > is the > > > > > > > only thing I should get. > > > > > > > > > I updated this profile and I don't see anything in sandbox, how > do I > > > > > > > know what is wrong? > > > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 12:06 pm, Apurv Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am not sure you can get the gadget-id. To pass the id where > > > > > required, > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > can use @app in the templates. Why do you need the gadget Id, > > > > > > > incidentally? > > > > > > > > > > -apurv > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, anatoly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi apurv > > > > > > > > > > > How can I make an equivalent to the following call in > templates > > > > > > > > > gadgets.util.getUrlParameters()["gadgetId"] > > > > > > > > > > > to get the gadget id? > > > > > > > > > Did not find that in the docs > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 7:41 am, Apurv Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sharath, > > > > > > > > > > Those are regular html tags and are allowed. > > > > > > > > > > > > @prashant: > > > > > > > > > > > > If you use only basic html, you should be fine and > profile view > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > display > > > > > > > > > > when we enable all applications. I am curious though: is > your > > > > > profile > > > > > > > > > view > > > > > > > > > > not at all dependent on viewer/owner? If yes, then > remeber that > > > > > JS > > > > > > > won't > > > > > > > > > > execute on profile page - so you would have to use > templates to > > > > > > > customize > > > > > > > > > > the profile view per owner/viewer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > -apurv- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orkut Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
