Ashok,

I have a problem.

I'm having a tough time finding an original new thread for this subject as I
find that this message has been sent to all threads.
Please point me to a thread where this question was raised originally (and
not a hijacking attempt of some other thread) and I would gladly reply to
this subject there.

Thanks,
Shishir

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Ashok.s New Delhi
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi
>
>  I have a Problem.
>
>  When (owner == viewer)  &  (owner != viewer)
>  In both cases  " NavigateToApp " Link  goes to owner canvas page.
>
>  When  (owner != viewer)  the link should goes  to viewer canvas  page.
>  But currently the link goes to owner canvas page.
>
>  It is a Bug.
>  How to redirect Viewer Canvas page. When  (owner != viewer) ?
>
> pls let me know ...
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:32 AM, jayesh sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Eduardo,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, we will fix the stats reported on AppInfo and emails
>> soon. Note that this particular error doesn't impact the ranking in
>> AppDirectory page.
>>
>> Jayesh
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Eduardo Rocha <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Kindly asking about this once again.
>>>
>>> Since I got no one answer last time I asked, here it goes: we,
>>> developers, need at least some feedback, otherwise there is no
>>> confidence on investing time in the platform, which Orkut called us to
>>> participate.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> On 1 jun, 03:01, Eduardo Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Is there any news about this issue?
>>> >
>>> > Also, I am bit worried about BuddyPoke not being #1 in pt directory,
>>> > curious about why the current ranking algorithm relegated it to the
>>> > 2nd place.
>>> >
>>> > On 21 maio, 03:03, Apurv Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Yes - there is a problem with the way the number is computed. We'll
>>> fix it.
>>> > > Thanks for the report!
>>> >
>>> > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Eduardo Rocha <
>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > Apurv, have you received an email I sent you? This number is 8687
>>> > > > today.
>>> >
>>> > > > On 20 maio, 01:51, Apurv Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > Eduardo,
>>> > > > > can you give us the application ID and URL and I'll check.
>>> 7-day-active
>>> > > > > users is supposed to reflect that # of users that used the canvas
>>> view in
>>> > > > > last 7 days.
>>> >
>>> > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > -apurv
>>> >
>>> > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Eduardo Rocha <
>>> > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > Of course "skyhigh" here is relative to the previous number :)
>>> >
>>> > > > > > On 20 maio, 01:27, Eduardo Rocha <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > I just enabled profile view for an application of mine and
>>> the weekly
>>> > > > > > > users number wentskyhigh, going from 600 to 3400, in a 24
>>> hours
>>>  > > > > > > period. Server data doesn't match this new number at all.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > Other than that, there are a looooot of applications with
>>> retention
>>> > > > > > > (weekly users / users with app) greater than 80%, which is a
>>> > > > retention
>>> > > > > > > rate that even Orkut probably doesn't have.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > Is weekly users number supposed to indicate profile views as
>>> well?
>>> > > > > > > IMO, this number should indicate how many "users with app"
>>> have
>>> > > > > > > visited the canvas view of a particular application.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Ashokkumar.S
> 09711560696.
>
> >
>


-- 

Calvin Trillin<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/calvin_trillin.html>
- "Health food makes me sick."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Orkut Developer Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to