Thanks for the reply Robson. Yes, I included the param in the signature base string but still I got bad request. There may be some other problem. But anyways, for me it worked when I kept the scope parameter in Authorization header.
Regards, Devendra On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Robson Dantas <[email protected]>wrote: > Checked my lib, and I'm passing in the querystring. OAuthPlayground and > OAuth Lib (java version) also do the same. > > Dont forget to compute it in the signature base string. > > -Robson Dantas > > 2010/9/12 Devendra A <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> Please ignore my last mail. I am able to solve it. >> But I came to know one thing that some part of documentation of OAuth on >> google site (http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/docs/OAuth_ref.html) is >> really confusing. For example documentation of OAuthGetRequestToken reads: >> >> *Depending on the type of request sent, these parameters can be placed >> in:* >> >> - *Authorization header of a **GET** or **POST** request. Use >> "**Authorization: >> OAuth**". All parameters listed above can go in the header, except >> for **scope** and**xoauth_displayname**, which must go either in the >> body or in the URL as a query parameter. The example below puts them in >> the body of the request.* >> >> >> So it means I should not be able to send "scope" in authorization header, >> but I was able to get a valid request token by sending scope in >> authorization header. >> >> Regards, >> Devendra >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Devendra A <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am struggling with authentication process in my library. I am using >>> qoauth, an open source implementation of oauth in Qt. Here is the problem: >>> I am able to get *request token* but when I try to authorize the same >>> token, I get "*invalid token*" error. I checked, if I generate the >>> request token in oauth playground using same consumer key and shared secret >>> ("anonymous" and "anonymous") and try to authorize that token in my code, it >>> works. So it proves that there is no problem in my way of authorization. The >>> problem seems to be somewhere in request token generation. I looked further >>> and found that qoauth library puts all the parameters in http header while >>> the documentation of orkut API says that "scope" parameter should go as url >>> query parameter. I moved the "scope" parameter to url but then I started >>> getting http *bad request* (400) error. >>> My question is if there was some problem in the token generation why >>> did google server return that token? It should return only valid token. >>> Any guess what the problem could be? Any suggestion is welcome. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Devendra >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Devendra A <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Prashant, >>>> >>>> Yes, thats ok as we dont have any other solution. >>>> >>>> >> thanks for releasing your library! >>>> Thanks, but we have not yet released the library. We have ported only >>>> small part of the client library till now. Still we have a long way to go >>>> :) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Devendra >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Prashant (Google) <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Devendra, >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that's the way to go. Client libraries for the same API but for >>>>> different platforms all get to have a project site of their own, from >>>>> where they can be cross-linked to each other. I just added links to >>>>> the PHP, .NET and Qt libraries that all of you from the community have >>>>> contributed to the "external links" section of orkut-os-client project >>>>> home page, and would suggest you to do the same. >>>>> >>>>> The issue about syncing up the libraries is a real one, but I'll make >>>>> it a point going forward to intimate everyone on this list whenever >>>>> there's a change to the API, so we can all update our respective >>>>> libraries. Works well for you? >>>>> >>>>> And thanks for releasing your library! >>>>> >>>>> ~Prashant >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 13, 6:05 am, devendra devendra <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I was thinking that somebody will answer or at least comment on my >>>>> question, >>>>> > but it looks nobody has the clear answer. >>>>> > >>>>> > By the way, how is the porting of java client library going on in >>>>> other >>>>> > languages? It looks, those are separate projects as I dont see any >>>>> other >>>>> > folder inside orkut-os-client repository besides "java". Right? >>>>> > >>>>> > Anyway, we have started our work in a separate project, >>>>> "orkut-qt-client". >>>>> > >>>>> > Regards, >>>>> > Devendra >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:37 PM, devendra devendra < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > > What is the best way to host this project on code.google.com?: >>>>> > >>>>> > > a) Creating a separate project, >>>>> > > + We can manage the project ourselves e.g. we can add/remove >>>>> > > contributers and committers ourselves. >>>>> > > - Managing the project independently will cause sink problem >>>>> in >>>>> > > future. For example it will be difficult to keep track of update >>>>> being done >>>>> > > in java client. >>>>> > > - In future if we have to merge the code to the main project >>>>> > > (orkut-os-client), we lose the development history. >>>>> > >>>>> > > b) Working on a clone of orkut-os-client >>>>> > > + Merging to main project in future will be easy without >>>>> loosing >>>>> > > development history. >>>>> > > - Difficulty in managing the team. We will have to disturb and >>>>> get >>>>> > > approval of orkut-os-client owner to add committers and >>>>> contributers. >>>>> > > + I hope, as contributors or committers, we will get >>>>> notifications of >>>>> > > changes being done in orkut java client lib, so easy to be in sync. >>>>> > >>>>> > > Regards, >>>>> > > Devendra >>>>> > >>>>> > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:32 PM, devendra devendra < >>>>> > > [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > >> Thanks a lot Prashant and Robson for your support. >>>>> > >>>>> > >> We have just started the work by dividing initial tasks. I will >>>>> try to >>>>> > >> post the updates actively whenever we achieve significant >>>>> milestones. I know >>>>> > >> that we will need your help at many places while doing this >>>>> work.[?] >>>>> > >>>>> > >> Cheers, >>>>> > >> Devendra >>>>> > >>>>> > >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Robson Dantas < >>>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Hi Devendra! >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> First, congrats for the initiative. Would be really great having >>>>> 3legged >>>>> > >>> library ported to other languages. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> As a 3legged phplib developer, think have enough arguments for >>>>> you, and >>>>> > >>> when starting, decided not porting, but creating a simpler >>>>> version. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> 1) I think the most important thing is having a standard C++ >>>>> library to >>>>> > >>> be used, and in fact, it is already done, see: >>>>> > >>>http://liboauth.sourceforge.net/ >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Basically your work will be related to handle RPC messages and >>>>> captcha >>>>> > >>> challenges. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> 2) Orkut guys are busy with their priorities, but when I needed, >>>>> Prashant >>>>> > >>> and Shishir (both from Google) kindly helped me. Dont expect to >>>>> have a >>>>> > >>> library overview and what you need to do. It's more productive >>>>> understanding >>>>> > >>> Orkut OS (java) or Orkut Php OS (php) and also checking >>>>> fotoscrapr, which >>>>> > >>> was created using the java lib. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> 3) I'm following Apache 2.0, which is the same for almost >>>>> opensocial >>>>> > >>> libs. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Spent lot of time understanding what was done by Orkut guys, and >>>>> if you >>>>> > >>> need any help, just let us know. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Regards, >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Robson Dantas >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> 2010/8/4 Devendra <[email protected]> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Hi Guys, >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> We are a group of 2-3 Qt developers and we realized that >>>>> it would >>>>> > >>>> be >>>>> > >>>> really helpful not only for us but for many Qt developers if we >>>>> could >>>>> > >>>> get orkut java client ported on Qt. So we are planning to port >>>>> the >>>>> > >>>> library on Qt. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> I have a few questions regarding this: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> 1) What do you think about this idea? >>>>> > >>>> 2) What kind of support can we expect from orkut team? Can we >>>>> expect >>>>> > >>>> some help in understanding over all client library and/or >>>>> getting >>>>> > >>>> existing design docs? >>>>> > >>>> 3) What would be the type of license for such a port? As a >>>>> > >>>> contributor, will we have any control on licensing of this port? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Regards, >>>>> > >>>> Devendra >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> -- >>>>> > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>> Google >>>>> > >>>> Groups "orkut Developer Forum" group. >>>>> > >>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> > >>>> [email protected]<opensocial-orkut%[email protected]><opensocial-orkut%2Bunsubscrib >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > >>>> . >>>>> > >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> > >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> -- >>>>> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>> Google Groups >>>>> > >>> "orkut Developer Forum" group. >>>>> > >>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> > >>> [email protected]<opensocial-orkut%[email protected]><opensocial-orkut%2Bunsubscrib >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > >>> . >>>>> > >>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > 330.gif >>>>> > < 1KViewDownload >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "orkut Developer Forum" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>>> . >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]<opensocial-orkut%[email protected]> >>>>> . >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "orkut Developer Forum" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<opensocial-orkut%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "orkut Developer Forum" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<opensocial-orkut%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "orkut Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-orkut?hl=en.
