On 06/10/08 21:46, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Joseph Kowalski wrote: >> We understand that we have little control about the content of the >> actual binaries. The only thing we can control is the documentation >> (more exactly, supplement the documentation). We should *never* make >> subjective statements in the documentation, but factual "Danger Will >> Robertson" NOTES seem quite appropriate. > > We already add an Attributes table to many (most?) upstream man pages, > so "Does Solaris Auditing?" could be just another line we start adding > to the table. (Is there something more useful to administrators than > a boolean there? Like an audit record type which may be "none"?) >
We'll take the suggestion of adding some words to the manpage with us in this phase. I like the suggestion of adding to the table, but it wouldn't make sense to do this for just this command. I'll ping the audit and doc folks to see if we can put a stick in the sand here, or whether we'll just go verbal and explain it in a NOTES section. Joep
